During week two we
were asked to participate in a wiki discussion group. The discussion focussed
on mobile phone use in the classroom. We were asked to categorise our responses
by way of De Bono’s Six Thinking Hats.
The wiki worked well
for this exercise. I found it to be a fast collaborative tool. It provided an insight
into each group member’s way of thinking. Reading the responses acted as an
incentive to think deeper in order to come up with something new.
Listed below are
some observations from my participation in the wiki activity:
Benefits
- Ease of use. Requires knowledge of only 3 buttons.
- Fast way to share information.
- Logical. (Structurally)
- Reasonably transparent collaborative tool.
- Work is stored in one location and is easily accessible.
Drawbacks
- Overwhelmed with the level of information. It was a lot to read at times.
- Difficult for everyone to contribute if the group size is too large or the subject scope is too narrow.
Issues
- Editing. Potential to erase other posts
- Timing issues. Two people can’t work on a page at the same time.
- Readability. Choice of font colour made it difficult to read some posts. Name on left side did not match up with postings on the right. Had to keep scrolling up to see who wrote what.
- Ethical issues. Specifically, respecting the contribution of other group members.
These observations
made me realise the importance of teacher involvement. If I was going to use a
wiki as a learning tool, I would pay particular attention to the following:
- Implementing guidelines (i.e. font color and size, word limit, etc),
- Monitoring the information,
- Encouraging effective group communication,
- Helping students develop a plan of attack (i.e. who works on what, and when),
- Reinforcing good ‘netiquette.’
Arguments can be
made as to how the wiki forum relates to each of the learning theories.
However, I feel as though it aligns itself most to Social Constructivism and
Connectivism. I have spoken about Connectivism in a previous post. A wiki
provides a place for the storing and sharing of information, a key feature of
Connectivist theory.
Social
Constructivism theorises that learning develops as a social practice (Ford &
Lott). Through interacting with others, a learner is able to build upon their
knowledge, resulting in a higher level of understanding about a topic. The wiki certainly facilitated this
type of learning. The Six Thinking Hats scaffold allowed the debate about
mobile phone usage to be discussed from a variety of angles. While it is
possible that this learning activity could have been achieved just as
effectively as a classroom discussion, the use of the wiki extends the
potential for learning. Students from all over the world could have been
invited to participate in the mobile phone discussion. This could have provided
a global insight into the discussion.
In all, I found a
wiki to be an effective tool for collaboration. It certainly provides an
opportunity for rich and diverse learning experiences. Students can become
their own content creators and can share knowledge with one another. However, time
and care needs to be taken by the teacher in order to effectively manage this
type of learning.
Reference:
Ford,
K & Lott, L. (n.d.) The impact of
technology on constructivist pedagogies. Retrieved from: https://sites.google.com/a/boisestate.edu/edtechtheories/the-impact-of-technology-on-constructivist-pedagogies-1

No comments:
Post a Comment